Post by account_disabled on Mar 6, 2024 6:46:43 GMT
Sometimes From a Feminist Position We Demand That Fathers Play Their Role and We Can Often Force Women Who Did Not Want to Depend on These Men to Do So. In the Context of This Crisis, We Need to Link the Discussion of Parental Alimony to That Basic Citizen Income That All People Should Be Assured. In the Context of This Crisis, It is Essential to Protect Employment, but Within a Greater Objective: Protect Income. All People, Including Those Mothers, Must Have Enough for the Minimum Food Basket.
That Does Not Mean That We Should Leave Responsibility. We Have to Think About How Those Who Can Honor Those Responsibilities and Those Who Can't Now and Can Later Do So. My Point is That We Cannot Condition the Subsistence of the Mother and the Sons and Daughters on the Father's Alimony. Finally, I Would UK Mobile Database Like Us to Talk About Another Area of care That is Central: Paid Care. Should They Be Rethought, Disputed and Relocated Within the Political Plot? Definitely. An Essential Service Such as Care Should Not Be Exploited. At This Moment We Have a Crisis in the Work of Private Households Throughout the Region. More Than % of Employed Women Work in the Homes of Other Women and Men. These Are Very Precarious Jobs. The Reason Why We Can Privatize So Much Demand for.
Care is Because It is Poorly Paid, Little Paid and There is a Lot of Lack of Protection. What Should Happen to Those Jobs? It is Quite a Question, Because Most of These Working Women Are Wishing for All This to End So They Can Go Back There Because They Have No Options. The Particularity of the Care Agenda is That, at the Same Time, It is a Social Protection Agenda and a Labor Market Agenda (Both Supply and Demand). So, It Allows Us to Go From What Happens in the Family to the Sectors of the Economy That Should Be Prioritized, Valued and Protected. An Important Part of the Productive Sectors and Ways of Working Have Already Been Modified by the Crisis and Will Be Modified Further. We Need the Care Agenda to Be Installed in That Conversation.
That Does Not Mean That We Should Leave Responsibility. We Have to Think About How Those Who Can Honor Those Responsibilities and Those Who Can't Now and Can Later Do So. My Point is That We Cannot Condition the Subsistence of the Mother and the Sons and Daughters on the Father's Alimony. Finally, I Would UK Mobile Database Like Us to Talk About Another Area of care That is Central: Paid Care. Should They Be Rethought, Disputed and Relocated Within the Political Plot? Definitely. An Essential Service Such as Care Should Not Be Exploited. At This Moment We Have a Crisis in the Work of Private Households Throughout the Region. More Than % of Employed Women Work in the Homes of Other Women and Men. These Are Very Precarious Jobs. The Reason Why We Can Privatize So Much Demand for.
Care is Because It is Poorly Paid, Little Paid and There is a Lot of Lack of Protection. What Should Happen to Those Jobs? It is Quite a Question, Because Most of These Working Women Are Wishing for All This to End So They Can Go Back There Because They Have No Options. The Particularity of the Care Agenda is That, at the Same Time, It is a Social Protection Agenda and a Labor Market Agenda (Both Supply and Demand). So, It Allows Us to Go From What Happens in the Family to the Sectors of the Economy That Should Be Prioritized, Valued and Protected. An Important Part of the Productive Sectors and Ways of Working Have Already Been Modified by the Crisis and Will Be Modified Further. We Need the Care Agenda to Be Installed in That Conversation.